I avoided doing this for as long as possible since a Palin was obviously going to end up getting this award at some point but I really thought it would be Sarah first.
Instead, Bristol Palin gets the claim the title this week.
"There but for the grace of God…" and all that aside, the Palins aren't the best family to be speaking at all about raising chilluns. Sarah's "abstinence only" approach to sex education was at least partially to blame for a tennage unwed mom (although apparently wine coolers had something to do with it as well).
This week, after President Obama's historic pronouncement regarding his views on gay marriage Bristol Palin stopped shoving McDonald's burgers into her mouth long enough to decry his values.
The New York Post, through the FAUX News…, I'm sorry I mean FOX News website I looked at stated that Bristol Palin was "horrified that President Barack Obama based his decision to support same-sex marriage in part on getting to know some of his daughters' friends who have gay parents". (Note about souce: I was going to give the link to the little dumpling's purported blog but my computer kept erasing the link, I can only assume out of protest at supporting her even that much).
The Ass of the Week then went on to say "We know that in general kids do better growing up in a mother/father home".
Pot meet kettle.
Perhaps the useless Ms. Palin would like to address if it is so important and key to a child's well being, why she isn't married? In addition, perhaps she or some other FAUX News watcher could point to real studies that show it is detrimental to a child to grow up with gay parents?
I thought not.
Unfortunately, too many ignorant ass, right wing ignoramuses will applaud Ms. Palin never thinking about the hypocrisy they are embracing.
But then again, those idiots liked Bush, supported her mom, and are about to vote for Romney.
By the way, the other big contender for Ass of the Week were the Christians who want to cite sections of the Bible and ignore others. Either the things in the Bible evolve over time or they do not. You can't pick and choose which sections you think apply and which ones you don't unless you agree with the principle that the Bible set forth rules that have changed with society.
Jesus didn't address homosexuality in the New Testament and he could have if he had wanted to. Instead, to get to a condemnation of gays you have to twist words and read between the lines.
If you want to believe that then you have to stop eating crops grown from the crop rotation principle, wearing clothes made of more than one material, and other ideas that no longer apply.
With that I'll leave you with this scene from The West Wing:
http://youtu.be/S1-ip47WYWc






